Yea that. Perhaps we should establish what "early" is. 5 weeks is pointless on that we agree but I think 7-8 weeks is totally reasonable.
Originally Posted by keen1981
But sometimes it's that first ultrasound that determines risk.... So..... What do you propose the solution is? No ultrasounds unless bleeding? Unless you had a previous problems (obviously moms with no other births wouldn't qualify..)
I'm just confused. I got ultrasounds for reasons. Idk if you'd deem them appropriate or not.. Not that i'd care...
Just curious. For the first time mom who may or may not know when her period was... No ultrasounds? Only the 20 week? Why then? Just curious.
Sent from my iPhone using DS Forum
SAHM to Gabriela 10.12.07 & Liliana 4.19.10 & Elijah 3.21.2013