View Single Post
Old 12-21-2012, 05:48 PM   #11
kaylabelle05's Avatar
kaylabelle05
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 1,896
My Mood:
Re: Which would be considered better? (long)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheezpoofs View Post
Thirty-eight weeks might would be the perfect time for baby to born, if it was just the right time for that particular baby and if you could be absolutely certain that thirty-eight weeks was exactly as far along you were. Since you can't predict these things from the outside, I don't think this aspect can be determined accurately.
I know my dates within 1 day. I had a blood test on the 5/26 due to having a kidney infection. I started testing within 5 days of then and the day AF was due (6/11), I got a BFP. I had been testing because of symptoms and got faint +'s before then. Plus when I went in for my 1st appt, my old OB did an U/S to see if it was viable (too many MC's) and had my conception date of 5/26 instead of 5/25 like I had.
__________________
ME: Dagny 34. Married 7/16/04 to: DH: 36. US Navy Corpsman. DS: Quinn 15. Future Mad Scientist DD: Kayla 8. Future Pink Mermaid Ballerina Princess
DS2: Colin 14 monhs. Walking toddler!
Feed your children human milk as long as possible, it might save their life. It did my son's.
kaylabelle05 is offline   Reply With Quote