Come and place your guesses, "angle of the danglers"! Guess genders 13w twins!

[~happy2Bamommy~]

It looks like to me that baby B is turned slightly to where we are seeing more of the back of skull. You can see more of the back and it looks like it is resting with it's head on a pillow instead of cradled in a profile pic? Arm is away from camera, not on side like in profile and leg is fwd too?

Does the skull theory apply if the baby is being viewed by what appears to be the back of the head?

[mommajewels]

I think you have B/G twins in there! Baby A looks to be a boy and baby B appears to be a girl.

[Heather8183]

Originally Posted by bigmamakelsey I must be the idiot of the bunch, I thought 2 sacs meant fraternal too I've never heard the skull theory, either.. Is it just the shape of the skull? Both my boys looked like photo B, with the protruding forehead at that stage.

Don't feel bad I don't think everyone knows that kind of stuff. But that was her SOLE job...doing US for pg women. I just thought she should know, or at the very least not say "go home and google it" lol

[amandajiggles]

I say two girls. I have very similar US photos from both girls. My nephew looked way different in utero.

[mommajewels]

Originally Posted by mommajewels I think you have B/G twins in there! Baby A looks to be a boy and baby B appears to be a girl.

I was on my phone earier, didn't see the "b" and "a" lable over the babies and assumed a was on the left and b on the right. I actually think b is a boy, and a is a girl... going off the nubs alone. Baby b's nub appears to have a slight upwards curve at the end, and to me.. baby a's nub looks completely horizontal.

[Green Decals]

27% of identical twins don't share a sac. So says my husband's genetics textbook. Though his 80-year-old grandmother is still in denial that her sons are identical. I should post pictures - they are literally harder to tell apart at age 60 than my mother and her identical, mirror twin. And honestly, I am pretty damn certain that I know my own mother.

[Heather8183]

Originally Posted by ~happy2Bamommy~ It looks like to me that baby B is turned slightly to where we are seeing more of the back of skull. You can see more of the back and it looks like it is resting with it's head on a pillow instead of cradled in a profile pic? Arm is away from camera, not on side like in profile and leg is fwd too? Does the skull theory apply if the baby is being viewed by what appears to be the back of the head?

I don't know much about the skull theory, I was going off nubs. Here are the other pics though

[divergirldee]

I'm thinking two girls