Closed Thread Hey Mom! Learn more about the Gerber Life Insurance Grow-Up Plan!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2008, 09:58 AM   #31
MamaOf3Cuties's Avatar
MamaOf3Cuties
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Where the gators swim, Louisiana
Posts: 3,879
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Granny's Woolies View Post
Thanks for your concern about my business rep. I don't really know why you felt the need to post that on this thread however.
because we are trying to help banned mamas and you're comment was rude and uncalled for - nuff said

Advertisement

__________________
Mama of 5 and 1 foster baby

Last edited by MamaOf3Cuties; 03-15-2008 at 09:58 AM. Reason: typo
MamaOf3Cuties is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 10:04 AM   #32
Granny's Woolies
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 99
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Quote:
Originally Posted by MamaOf3Cuties View Post
because we are trying to help banned mamas and you're comment was rude and uncalled for - nuff said
What I said was no ruder than other comments made on this thread and I fully support helping these banned mamas. It is a very sad situation that got out of hand. I would like to see a forgive and forget attitude but it is Lee's board and she can ban whomever she wishes.
Granny's Woolies is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 10:05 AM   #33
cassondruh's Avatar
cassondruh
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Willamette Valley, OR
Posts: 3,632
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Lee's a he
__________________
Booty Cubes, Postpartum Mommy Cubes, Hand Sanitizers & MORE!
Mommy to Merinda and identical twin boys Adrian & Dorian
Big pouches of Booty Cubes for sale!
cassondruh is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 10:11 AM   #34
Granny's Woolies
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 99
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassondruh View Post
Lee's a he

Oh then that was rude huh....lol
Granny's Woolies is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 10:51 AM   #35
presleycaedmon's Avatar
presleycaedmon
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 2,051
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Quote:
Originally Posted by zosiasmama View Post
I am very sad to hear this Lee. You made the rules, posted them and then expected everyone to understand them, not questions them (even though some were just absurd and ridiculous to follow) and then banned people for not following them. All of this within a few short hours.
Seems to me like you were trying to set some of us up for failure.

Very sad IMO, that is why I asked the question here. It does not seem right that a person with so many strikes against her (Kim) would be just wiped clean even though she has so many over such a long time, but someone who broke one NEW (several hard to accept and unfair) rule would be bannished forever. There is really no sense in that and I would very much appreciate further explanation.
Thank you, Danni


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelolsen-and-Padawan View Post
Okay, I honestly want to know. Kim said some hateful things about you on other boards and asked for help. how is that different? this isn't an "attack" on Kim. I just would like to know the double standard. not everyone who was banned were on the boards where she asked for help either. I honestly just want to know and I won't pester or ask again. This is my one time asking.
__________________
Amanda: Wife to Kevin and AP Mama to Caedmon Jeremiah *8-8-01* and Presley Claire *3-31-06*
My blog, Kevin's blog, Presley's Home Birth
presleycaedmon is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 10:59 AM   #36
Jubilee's Avatar
Jubilee
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 2,328
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowmommy View Post
Lee already responded with the final ruling on this
I have been pretty quiet on this, and at one point in the poof thread, I was even beginning to get annoyed with the ladies who weren't comprehending the rules. Despite the fact that the rules aren't clearly defined, it was as if they were intentionally going out of their way to be difficult (which I'm sure they were. The whole thing was heated on all ends.)

That said, I think this is pretty bad wording.... "final ruling." Does that imply that this discussion is over? I think there are more than "several hateful mamas" that would like more answers and explanations. Assuming the "hateful mamas" have all been banned, there are plenty of legitimate questions in this post.
__________________
Blessed mama of 2,
loving wife to my p,
and full-time student.
Jubilee is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 11:30 AM   #37
shastakat's Avatar
shastakat
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Batavia,Ohio
Posts: 1,021
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

As always, I completely missed what happened. Sounds like that was a good thing though.
__________________
Kelley-Momma to Ryanne(RYAN) April 2005, Keira October 2007 and Liam Edward June 24th 2009
shastakat is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 11:49 AM   #38
Sweet_Fantasy_Fox
No Longer Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ~*West Coast*~
Posts: 61,873
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jubilee View Post
I have been pretty quiet on this, and at one point in the poof thread, I was even beginning to get annoyed with the ladies who weren't comprehending the rules. Despite the fact that the rules aren't clearly defined, it was as if they were intentionally going out of their way to be difficult (which I'm sure they were. The whole thing was heated on all ends.)

That said, I think this is pretty bad wording.... "final ruling." Does that imply that this discussion is over? I think there are more than "several hateful mamas" that would like more answers and explanations. Assuming the "hateful mamas" have all been banned, there are plenty of legitimate questions in this post.
The decison has been made, Lee answered truthfully and their really is no more to it. I am sorry some of you feel it's not fair but the need to continue to ask the same questions that have been answered will not change what has been explained by Lee.
Sweet_Fantasy_Fox is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 12:03 PM   #39
Harmony96's Avatar
Harmony96
Administrator
sitesupporter
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 24,287
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee View Post
Many of you didn't see all of what the DS staff team saw. I am glad you didn't as it was sickening and sad.
You guys, I've read all of Lee's posts in this thread, and this bit sticks out at me. He's not telling us the gory details of what went down and what was said for OUR peace of mind. I am glad he's not telling us. I don't want to have to keep coming back to thinking about it and saying "wow, I can't believe so-and-so and so-and-so could SAY something that horrendous." Being an admin is a hard job w/ hard decisions. Lee made them. DS will ultimately be a better place as a result. But not until the dead horse that we're all beating is buried and gone.
__________________
Andrea, child of God, wife of Tim, charting, sewing and authoring mama of L, B, ^i^ J, J, and G
Usborne Books & More - Ask me about DOUBLE FREE books!
Join in September for just $25!
Harmony96 is offline  
Old 03-15-2008, 12:08 PM   #40
zosiasmama's Avatar
zosiasmama
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lomza, Poland by way of MI
Posts: 6,074
My Mood:
Re: Ok so Kim was allowed back...what about the others who were banned trying...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harmony96 View Post
You guys, I've read all of Lee's posts in this thread, and this bit sticks out at me. He's not telling us the gory details of what went down and what was said for OUR peace of mind. I am glad he's not telling us. I don't want to have to keep coming back to thinking about it and saying "wow, I can't believe so-and-so and so-and-so could SAY something that horrendous." Being an admin is a hard job w/ hard decisions. Lee made them. DS will ultimately be a better place as a result. But not until the dead horse that we're all beating is buried and gone.
I see what your saying, I know that their job must be really hard.

But I know that not all the people banned during that time were banned for aying horrible things. Several of us are continuing to ask because a few of them are being lumped into the group that did severly cross the line, but not all of them did. that is what we are asking here, for a bit of consideration on a case by case basis.
__________________
banned for excessive strikes

Want to know about making money with ChaCha? Ask me!
I made $350 last month!Hits4Pay Want some Moola?
zosiasmama is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Copyright 2005 - 2014 Escalate Media. All Rights Reserved.