View Poll Results: Hybrid Diapers?
They're a total ripoff 19 20.88%
They are pricey but I do them anyway 8 8.79%
Cloth is the only way to go if you really care 64 70.33%
Disposable is the only way to go if you look at everything 0 0%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Hey Mom! Learn more about the Gerber Life Insurance Grow-Up Plan!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2012, 06:06 PM   #1
blakesdad
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Thumbs down The economics of hybrid diapers is broken

Hi, we have been using disposable diapers for our 1-week old son. Looking at them, the sheer wastefulness is staggering: not only do we throw away a dozen diapers every day, but those diapers are usually only a little bit soiled in terms of both area dirtied and what they're soiled with (ie urine is not that big a deal).

So, we had this bright idea: use cloth diapers. But it quickly came up that we did not want to be burdened with washing endless poopy diapers just to be less wasteful.

A little research later, and I found the product I thought would solve both problems: hybrid diapers. Less waste, roughly the same amount of work, and - because you're buying a small insert instead of the whole diaper - lower cost. What could go wrong?

Well, as it turns out, hybrid diapers make no sense. Let's take a look at their sorted prices (diaperjunction.com):
Huggies disposable diapers: $.28 each
Flip Diaper inserts: $.31 each
Grovia Biosoakers: $.38 each
gDiaper Biodegradables: $.40 each

The kicker is, of course, that not only are the hybrid inserts more expensive, but there are also other costs, such as the original holding diaper which costs as much as 50+ disposables itself, plus the detergent, water, and other costs of actually using the hybrids.

Now, I ask you, why would I pay more for something which gives me less? Not only is the product literally less material and craftsmanship, but it offers less utility in that I would now be washing the holding diaper and doing the work of putting in and removing the insert, whereas the disposable you just toss. For the privilege of doing more work, and getting less product, I'm going to pay more? That is totally bonkers.

The economics of hybrid diapers are fundamentally flawed.

Cloth diapers, of course, over the long haul are cheaper by 90% than disposable. If you're willing to do all the poopy laundry for ~2 years and assign your labor and sensibility no value, that is. Hybrid diapers, however, are priced so irrationally it's now no surprise that I've never once seen them on the shelves in a store - why would any consumer buy them?

The answer of course is that the product is entirely targeted at "yuppies" and "greenies" and other hypothetical consumers who the businesses in question believe to be devoid of any money sense or who are willing to pay more just to get some vague sense of eased conscience. That's sad really, because as I said, I was initially interested in the product precisely because I am environmentally conscious and wanted to do the right thing. But being ripped off by some company because they think I'm foolish enough to whimsically part ways with my money is insulting.

Inserts should be $.15-.20 each, maximum. I'm looking forward to buying them at that time. In the meantime, I look forward to seeing what possible rational explanation there could be from someone who has actually bought some of these and doesn't consider them a poor deal.

Anyone care to defend this gross fleecing of not only the consumer, but also the planet, by incentivizing us to choose continuing purchase of wasteful diapers over enriching a corporation who believes we will pay them more profit to not have a guilty conscience?

Advertisement

blakesdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:11 PM   #2
EmmaGM's Avatar
EmmaGM
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 7,894
My Mood:
O_o
Just as there are different price points amongst CD types (prefolds vs aios) , hybrids are another option for the environmentally conscious.

Also, you've probably come to the wrong place to tell people laundering cloth diapers is a silly waste of time.

Sent from my Galaxy Skyrocket using DS Forum
__________________
Emma H&T Mama to Faolan 6/7/12 & Malachy 1/29/14
Mary born into heaven at 14 weeks
EmmaGM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:15 PM   #3
anniekins1488's Avatar
anniekins1488
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WI
Posts: 3,810
My Mood:
Re: The economics of hybrid diapers is broken

__________________
If you would like to donate your used cloth diapers to help families in need, please contact me!

Swag with me! I earn $25 in Amazon gift cards every month with very little effort! http://www.swagbucks.com/refer/Anniekins1488
anniekins1488 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:22 PM   #4
kbstanley3's Avatar
kbstanley3
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,387
My Mood:
Re: The economics of hybrid diapers is broken

Quote:
Originally Posted by blakesdad View Post
Hi, we have been using disposable diapers for our 1-week old son. Looking at them, the sheer wastefulness is staggering: not only do we throw away a dozen diapers every day, but those diapers are usually only a little bit soiled in terms of both area dirtied and what they're soiled with (ie urine is not that big a deal).

So, we had this bright idea: use cloth diapers. But it quickly came up that we did not want to be burdened with washing endless poopy diapers just to be less wasteful.

A little research later, and I found the product I thought would solve both problems: hybrid diapers. Less waste, roughly the same amount of work, and - because you're buying a small insert instead of the whole diaper - lower cost. What could go wrong?

Well, as it turns out, hybrid diapers make no sense. Let's take a look at their sorted prices (diaperjunction.com):
Huggies disposable diapers: $.28 each
Flip Diaper inserts: $.31 each
Grovia Biosoakers: $.38 each
gDiaper Biodegradables: $.40 each

The kicker is, of course, that not only are the hybrid inserts more expensive, but there are also other costs, such as the original holding diaper which costs as much as 50+ disposables itself, plus the detergent, water, and other costs of actually using the hybrids.

Now, I ask you, why would I pay more for something which gives me less? Not only is the product literally less material and craftsmanship, but it offers less utility in that I would now be washing the holding diaper and doing the work of putting in and removing the insert, whereas the disposable you just toss. For the privilege of doing more work, and getting less product, I'm going to pay more? That is totally bonkers.

The economics of hybrid diapers are fundamentally flawed.

Cloth diapers, of course, over the long haul are cheaper by 90% than disposable. If you're willing to do all the poopy laundry for ~2 years and assign your labor and sensibility no value, that is. Hybrid diapers, however, are priced so irrationally it's now no surprise that I've never once seen them on the shelves in a store - why would any consumer buy them?

The answer of course is that the product is entirely targeted at "yuppies" and "greenies" and other hypothetical consumers who the businesses in question believe to be devoid of any money sense or who are willing to pay more just to get some vague sense of eased conscience. That's sad really, because as I said, I was initially interested in the product precisely because I am environmentally conscious and wanted to do the right thing. But being ripped off by some company because they think I'm foolish enough to whimsically part ways with my money is insulting.

Inserts should be $.15-.20 each, maximum. I'm looking forward to buying them at that time. In the meantime, I look forward to seeing what possible rational explanation there could be from someone who has actually bought some of these and doesn't consider them a poor deal.

Anyone care to defend this gross fleecing of not only the consumer, but also the planet, by incentivizing us to choose continuing purchase of wasteful diapers over enriching a corporation who believes we will pay them more profit to not have a guilty conscience?
Honestly, I'm not going to argue with your point about hybrids as I also think they are overpriced. However, I do argue with the idea that cloth diapering is hard. I've been cloth diapering for over 5 years with 3 kiddos and it's really not that hard. It's 2-3 more loads of laundry a week, and what with the invention of modern washing machines and driers, it takes less than a few hours per week. I don't eat off/with completely disposable silverware or dinnerware simply because I don't want to "waste" my time washing it. Same goes with clothes, bed linens, etc. Can you imagine if that logic was used for every product we wash? I don't really care if you (general you) cloth diaper or disposable diaper, but don't try to tell me it's too hard.
__________________
Kim; FT student, mom to 3, and wife to Ed.

Last edited by kbstanley3; 06-14-2012 at 06:24 PM.
kbstanley3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:22 PM   #5
P!nkPepper's Avatar
P!nkPepper

Formerly Q......9
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 9,596
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmmaGM
O_o
Just as there are different price points amongst CD types (prefolds vs aios) , hybrids are another option for the environmentally conscious.

Also, you've probably come to the wrong place to tell people laundering cloth diapers is a silly waste of time.

Sent from my Galaxy Skyrocket using DS Forum
I agree. We are all addicts here. We love cloth diapers.

??? Not sure yet or for what though.

(I always wanted to use that)

Jodie ~ wife & mama
P!nkPepper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:23 PM   #6
Almacham
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Slytherin House
Posts: 15,946
My Mood:
Um.... wow. Welcome to Diaperswappers, dude.
__________________
Sarah, mom of many
Almacham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:25 PM   #7
MrsJordan85's Avatar
MrsJordan85
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,834
My Mood:
Re: The economics of hybrid diapers is broken

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freedom View Post
Um.... wow. Welcome to Diaperswappers, dude.
__________________
Elisabeth Renee Wifey to my hottie hubby & SAHM to my snuggly big boy
Ethan James 9.22.2006, my sweet middle girl, Selah Grace 1.15.2010, and my unplanned surprise homebirth, Levi Kristopher 12.13.2011
MrsJordan85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:26 PM   #8
el's mama
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,069
Re: The economics of hybrid diapers is broken

LOL
__________________
In with my DH, crunchy, attached Mama to 4. Homeschooling, long term breastfeeding, CD'ing, babywearing, homebirthing. Could I BE anymore addicted to cloth?!
el's mama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:27 PM   #9
kbstanley3's Avatar
kbstanley3
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,387
My Mood:
Re: The economics of hybrid diapers is broken

And why not do part time cloth/ part time disposable? It doesn't have to be so all or nothing...
__________________
Kim; FT student, mom to 3, and wife to Ed.
kbstanley3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 06:29 PM   #10
kbstanley3's Avatar
kbstanley3
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,387
My Mood:
Re: The economics of hybrid diapers is broken

Also, no one can rip you off if you choose not to buy their product. =) There are plenty of other options out there to use for diapering needs.
__________________
Kim; FT student, mom to 3, and wife to Ed.
kbstanley3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Copyright 2005 - 2014 Escalate Media. All Rights Reserved.