Reply Hey Mom! Learn more about the Gerber Life Insurance Grow-Up Plan!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2010, 03:09 PM   #11
Weezy6703's Avatar
Weezy6703
Registered Users
seller
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 7,081
My Mood:
Re: OS Pics on smaller babies?

thanks so much mamas..that's all I wanted to see was how they looked on smaller babies...sometimes bigger diapers can be a bit bulky. ;-)

Advertisement

__________________
Lisa, Landon - 7 and Owen - 4
Weezy6703 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 03:16 PM   #12
Ducko's Avatar
Ducko
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 3,058
My Mood:
Re: OS Pics on smaller babies?

My ds in a BGOS with newborn insert on the small setting. He is 3 months old here. I think about 14-15 lbs (I'd have to look it up). He started wearing them at 2 months old around 11-12 lbs.

__________________
Tracy

Wife to Eric. SAHM to Gray (6/08) and Seth (4/10)
Ducko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 05:13 PM   #13
AleahDeann's Avatar
AleahDeann
Registered Users
seller
seller
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,776
My Mood:
Re: OS Pics on smaller babies?

I started my son off in Happy Heiny OS and thought I would love them, and I loved everything about them EXCEPT for the excessive amount of diaper between his legs. So we switched to sized pocket diapers instead. Imagine a XL Pocket diaper amount of between leg fabric on a small diaper, I felt like my son always looked like a sumo wrestler. IMO, dont go OS until little one is older, like probably a year or so.
Here is my son in his OS at 3 months probably about 13 pounds
AleahDeann is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Copyright 2005 - 2014 Escalate Media. All Rights Reserved.